Author

Message

davesearles



Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 358
Location: Vermont

PostPosted: 07 May 2007 10:58 am    Post subject: Deleon/Debs

Reply with quoteEdit/Delete this postDelete this postView IP address of poster


I have been reading some of Deb's speeches. Unfortunately I have never read them before. Now I am asking myself, just what if any difference was there as to the specifics of what they were proposing? The workers taking ownership and administering in the name of society of the means of production. Taking this one step further, I don't see anything of the major points by either that would necessarily be anathema to the major points of the other. Such as neither was positing the necessity of a vanguard party.

I went to a SP party meeting down in Brattleboro yesterday and was very well received. talked about the possibility of me running for US House in 08 under the SP party designation on a straight SIU platform. They all seemed supportive of the idea.

So I have been mulling this over.

I am telling people that in historical perspective there is very little difference in what Debs and DeLeon advocated. How wrong am I?

dave

Back to top

View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail

davesearles



Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 358
Location: Vermont

PostPosted: 07 May 2007 11:08 am    Post subject:

Reply with quoteEdit/Delete this postDelete this postView IP address of poster


Mock Debs run for presidency. perhaps 08 this will be Debs' year.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/05/AR2007050500836.html?referrer=email

Back to top

View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail

mikelepore
Site Admin


Joined: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 484

PostPosted: 08 May 2007 08:05 pm    Post subject:

Reply with quoteEdit/Delete this postDelete this postView IP address of poster


If you had asked me what as wrong with Morris Hillquit or Victor Berger, I'd could answer. I don't know enough about Eugene Debs. For all I know, maybe he went SP instead of SLP mainly because of De Leon's personality, which apparently wasn't all warm'n'fuzzy.

Quote:

The workers taking ownership and administering in the name of society of the means of production.



The argument was about whether what you just said could be done (1) by many small degrees over the course of many years, instead of abruptly; (2) by having government take over the shops, while the workers take over the government.

Today, may cities own transportation systems. To Berger and Hillquit, if the city, county, state or the federal government, it doesn't matter which one, owns a railroad or something other shop or service, that _is_ "some" socialism, and the difference between "some" socialism and "still more" socialism is a matter of degree.

I don't know the positions of Debs. I know he radicalized real fast when he was sent to prison for supporting the 1894 railroad strike in Chicago, the one in which federal soldiers killed twenty workers. He was a tinkering reformist as of the late 1880s, when he was in the Social Democratic Party with Berger, but did 1894 or some other incident later cause him to grow out if it? It would be interesting to find an answer to that.

Back to top

View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website

davesearles



Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 358
Location: Vermont

PostPosted: 09 May 2007 12:08 am    Post subject:

Reply with quoteEdit/Delete this postDelete this postView IP address of poster


Oh, did I tell you that while I was at the meeting a rabbi came in and blessed the socialist meeting, that we were fulfilling one of god's objectives for us, to cure the world. We all felt much better after that and had a very productive meeting.

dave

Back to top

View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail

The Greenman



Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 146
Location: Western New York

PostPosted: 12 May 2007 06:16 am    Post subject:

Reply with quoteEdit/Delete this postDelete this postView IP address of poster


A rabbi came in to bless the meeting--this is interesting since he who saves one person saves the entire world. Dave, I have the highest respect for what you are doing and yes, Debs and De Leon were on the same page in many ways. De Leon was a bit spicy. Could it have been Latino blood?

Back to top

View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail

allhailtuna



Joined: 28 Sep 2008
Posts: 9

PostPosted: 30 Sep 2008 04:15 pm    Post subject:

Reply with quoteEdit/Delete this postDelete this postView IP address of poster


mikelepore wrote:

He was a tinkering reformist as of the late 1880s, when he was in the Social Democratic Party with Berger, but did 1894 or some other incident later cause him to grow out if it? It would be interesting to find an answer to that.


Reading Marx's works while in jail, apparently.

Back to top

View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail

mikelepore
Site Admin


Joined: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 484

PostPosted: 30 Sep 2008 08:01 pm    Post subject:

Reply with quoteEdit/Delete this postDelete this postView IP address of poster


Unfortunately, a lot of people read Marx and they still fail to come away with the message "when someone asks you what you want, tell them a new system." Instead, a lot of people think you have to take it real easy, just tell people you want more poor houses or something. God forbid you should shock anybody into having a heart attack by saying that you want a whole new system.

But Debs did focus quite a bit on the new system. I just don't know what he saw in a "multi-tendency" movement -- meaning that you can stand up for principles, while simultaneously slapping fellows on the back when they abandon principles. It goes against my grain. Maybe it's just my obsessive personality type.

Back to top

View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website

davesearles



Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 358
Location: Vermont

PostPosted: 30 Sep 2008 10:32 pm    Post subject:

Reply with quoteEdit/Delete this postDelete this postView IP address of poster


ml:

Quote:

I just don't know what he saw in a "multi-tendency" movement



ds:

Do you have a cite for that?

Back to top

View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail

mikelepore
Site Admin


Joined: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 484

PostPosted: 30 Sep 2008 11:22 pm    Post subject:

Reply with quoteEdit/Delete this postDelete this postView IP address of poster


You want a citation for the fact that Debs was in the Socialist Party? Any encyclopedia or U.S. history book.

Back to top

View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website

davesearles



Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 358
Location: Vermont

PostPosted: 01 Oct 2008 01:04 am    Post subject:

Reply with quoteEdit/Delete this postDelete this postView IP address of poster


When Debs was in, in the hayday of Debs, what was the multi-tendency?

Back to top

View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail

mikelepore
Site Admin


Joined: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 484

PostPosted: 01 Oct 2008 03:13 am    Post subject:

Reply with quoteEdit/Delete this postDelete this postView IP address of poster


There was always a "left wing of the SP" and a "right wing of the SP", from the first day it was founded. The whole membership of the Social Democratic Party, which had left and right wings, was taken into the SP by merger on the day that the SP was founded. The left wanted industrial unions, and more drastic changes like workers' control, and used the phrase "class struggle". The right wanted craft unions, and less drastic changes, mostly at the municipal level, like municipally owned water works and sewers and streetcars. Some of the big names in the SP left were Eugene Debs and the marxist Louis Boudin. Some of the big names in the SP right were Morris Hillquit and the Call newspaper editor Algernon Lee. The right usually got it's way due to greater numbers, but one notable time that the left got it's way was when Hillquit attempted to get the SP to endorse the government's World War I policy but instead the SP took a stand against the war. Even Victor Berger, "the first Socialist congressman", usually part of Hillquit's right wing, got a prison sentence for speaking out against the War.

Back to top

View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website